The inverse, or maybe the logical consequence of, @fchollet's observation: within 10-20 years, there won't be a field called "computer science" (except for a few theoreticians). All the "computer scientists" will be in their respective sciences, or art or business schools.https://twitter.com/fchollet/status/1389337090278658052 …
-
-
Yeah, I think there's a case to be made for making CS basics (programming, some algorithmics) a core curriculum (like math, or English) and leave it at that. Basically everyone needs that. Much fewer people need to study graphics, computer architecture, or operating systems.
-
Like in the original thread, there seems to be a confusion of 'needing cs skills for x' and 'advancing cs'. Ofc, only few people need in-depth operating systems knowledge, but I doubt that advancing general purpose os will become irrelevant within the next few decades.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"Microsoft's New Programming Language for Excel Now Turing Complete" -https://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2021/01/27/excel-lambda.aspx …
End of conversation
-
-
-
AS programming gets more user-friendly, which skills will stay relevant? What kind of mastery will separate good programmers from bad? Time complexity? Testing / Debugging? Writing things that are scalable?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.