Unless scientists learn better
philosophy of data
this will be a disaster
see @yudapearl &
limits of stats-on-Steroids ML
http://bit.ly/2MhZP48
ht @curiouswavefnhttps://twitter.com/fchollet/status/1389337090278658052 …
-
-
Simulations will play the primary role, and ML will often be a core component of these simulations. ML may not be the primary driver of this new retooling of these scientific fields, but it will be an important part of it.
-
Software is eating the world and ML is eating software. cc:
@a16z - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If most of a chemistry researcher's work is writing software, then that statement also assumes that the actual synthesis and testing of compounds will be done by robots. That also seems a long way off given how little automation has worked in the field.
-
I do see software increasingly driving the setup of chemistry experiments in terms of suggesting the most plausible paths, for instance in retrosynthesis and reaction planning as well as screening. But the main goal would be narrowing down the set of possibilities to test.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sensational prognostication but how is this any different from math? Or writing? Or pencil?https://twitter.com/AustenLamacraft/status/1389483199043182593 …
-
“Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes.” — Edsger Dijkstra
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.