You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Anyway, "most science will be CS", just like "most companies will be tech cos", is a prediction you should take seriously, but not literally. It means that CS proficiency will soon be indispensable to staying relevant as a scientist: most what you will do will require CS.
In the same way that "most cos will be tech cos" means that tech proficiency will be essential to staying in business: most of your operations will critically require tech. Walmart, AXA, FedEx, etc. are "tech companies".
It doesn't mean that chemistry will be literally classified as a subfield of CS, or that Walmart will be literally classified as a tech company. Obviously...
But it does mean that, if you were a business executive in 2000, you should hire people who understand tech (including at top levels), and if you're a scientist today, you should make sure that you develop your CS chops (including ML).
I think this is broadly correct. The early firms that bring their operations to the cloud and automate their processes and add a smart ML layer will be hard to catch for non-tech firms operating on vintage technology and 20th-century business models.
Tech is infrastructure for companies and can be the entire co’s product as well. Cars + roads led to shopeatdrive out -> urban planning /civil . WWW+usps infra for POS online. Now at AMZN, tech is products, logistics, POS. Everything builds on infra… “ICT + information science”
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
