You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Don't worry though, your domain expertise will remain very important. Just like how... uh... having a strong linguistics background is essential in natural language processing (formerly computational linguistics)...
Anyway, "most science will be CS", just like "most companies will be tech cos", is a prediction you should take seriously, but not literally. It means that CS proficiency will soon be indispensable to staying relevant as a scientist: most what you will do will require CS.
In the same way that "most cos will be tech cos" means that tech proficiency will be essential to staying in business: most of your operations will critically require tech. Walmart, AXA, FedEx, etc. are "tech companies".
It doesn't mean that chemistry will be literally classified as a subfield of CS, or that Walmart will be literally classified as a tech company. Obviously...
But it does mean that, if you were a business executive in 2000, you should hire people who understand tech (including at top levels), and if you're a scientist today, you should make sure that you develop your CS chops (including ML).
How does this extend to third world countries with a huge amount of people with no access to basic water? Do you think aid operations will become more optimised? Would increasing technological literacy also be of use?
This is vastly different phrasing (and not controversial whatsoever) from the original tweet, which IMO was incredibly condescending. Not surprised at the outrage
Tremendous back pedal. From *everything will be simulation, big data analytics and ML*, to *every field will benefit from CS*, which is probably already true.
The former will only happen to the degree that people are duped into thinking there is inferential magic there - and to be fair, your world has done an excellent job tricking lots of people into thinking exactly that.
that's not what "every branch of science will be a branch of computer science" actually means though. your OP was just trolling. if this is what you meant you could have just said it
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
