Personally I don't like to make such predictions myself, since it would require extrapolating from a series of past milestones, and at this time we have no milestones that point in the direction of general intelligence. It would be data-free extrapolation, i.e. making things up
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So... pretty much the same as fifty years ago?
-
Also: sixty years ago.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cognitive autonomy remains a mirage as things stand. The experts know this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hasn't that been true since the seventies? General AI has always been "around the corner".
-
Newell thought it was "5 years away" in the 1950s
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We’ll probably have something approximating agi by end of the century if we survive as a species that long.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Human level AI is an ill-defined notion. Neither do I think that human intelligence is "general". I was not of the opinion in 2015 that we will have human level AI in most domains by 2020, but I thought it will be possible between 2025 and 2030 and I still stick to that.
-
An iPhone is an ill defined notion too. Lossy compression is another ill-defined notion. How is human-level intelligence any more ill-defined compared to those notions? (In contrast “most domains” is indeed an ill-defined notion)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The problem is people just assume things get better (which is not true).
-
any examples?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.