Does @fchollet think that deep reinforcement learning is "intelligent"? No he doesn't. And he's right 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvRz885Un1Q …
-
Solving the current iteration of ARC: not at all, as that would imply ARC is a perfect benchmark, which it isn't. Being able to solve *arbitrary ARC tasks* generated on demand: yes, that would be human-level intelligence, although only in terms of abstract fluid intelligence.
It would still not capture other aspects of human cognition, like perception, behavior, goal-setting, and so on. Any intelligence benchmark should be an ongoing effort, to be refined as the flaws of the previous iteration become more apparent.
-
-
Fully agree. The more attention the benchmark receives the better it can be improved and bigger its push for new directions in development. Hopefully, current level, while difficult, can be fully solved with basic reasoning capabilities promoting gradual improvement
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.