Every system that possesses property X must be encoded in a lower layer of abstraction, which often does not feature property X. Pointing this out does not negate that X is real, it indicates at which level of abstraction one should be looking for the origin of X.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reductionism is a dangerous philosophy. “a live body and a dead body contain the same number of particles, why should he be concerned by the death of a person he knew?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great analogy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Illusions exist, or else what does it even mean to be illusory?
-
Illusion: something that arise from the interpretation/model (e.g., in the brain) of the data (physical measures, interactions) but that is not in the data. Yet, this is not a rigorous definition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know of some empirical evidence that back this statement (Benjamin Libet delayed conscious causation experiment & split brain patients being conciouss of unreal events), but I still believe that conciousness (and life for that matter) are ill-defined, which bias our views.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thirty years ago it should be called an emergent property
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is no such thing as a planet. It's just a bunch of atoms held together by various fundamental forces at different temperatures.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.