2020 was definitely a step backwards. If you're wondering how great civilizations can end up collapsing: they just have many 2020s in a row over several decades, with exponentially compounding cascade effects at each new development.
-
-
Our particular civilization, as a system, features significant structural risk factors that could enable collapse, but it also has important collapse-preventing characteristics. I think the latter factors will win out
Show this thread -
Hardships and setbacks can be catalysts of progress -- progress doesn't happen without challenges. Decline happens when we lose the ability to respond to challenges. Collapse happens when decline accelerates past a point of no return
Show this thread -
I think the coming hardships are more likely to become catalysts of progress than triggers of collapse
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The phrasing of “civilization collapse” masks the real phenomena. Things go wrong and break all the time. What makes collapse different is that people don’t rebuild afterward.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
400 years? You have an idea what would happen in 400 years from now? About 400 years ago Blaise Pascal invented the adding machine. Your field, A.I. exists, under this term for 56 years. Your Google was established 23 years ago. You're confident talking about 400 years from now?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Any specific reason for the optimism regarding global warming?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"Pretty rough patches" Ha! Good one! Climate change reduces carrying capacity, which is something less than 4 billion humans (assuming even a whisper of the natural world). We're nearing 8B. Overshoot never ends well.pic.twitter.com/w3adcIALDU
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.