The Turing test was *never* a relevant goal for AI. We should remember that Turing never intended it as a literal test to be passed by a machine designed for that purpose, but as a philosophical device in an argument about the nature of thinking.https://www.fastcompany.com/90590042/turing-test-obsolete-ai-benchmark-amazon-alexa …
-
Show this thread
-
The major flaw of the Turing test is that it entirely abdicates the responsibility of defining intelligence and how to evaluate it (the value of a test). Instead, it delegates the task to human judges, who themselves don't have a proper definition or a proper evaluation process.
3 replies 4 retweets 77 likesShow this thread -
As a result, the Turing test does not at all provide incentives to develop greater intelligence, it solely encourages developers to figure out how to trick humans into believing a chatbot is intelligent.
1 reply 6 retweets 67 likesShow this thread -
If you were trying to assess that a matter teleportation occured by asking an audience of witnesses about it, you'd be encouraging the development of prestidigitation tricks, not research in physics. This is the same. The Turing test encourages deception, not progress.
2 replies 7 retweets 69 likesShow this thread -
Bots that "pass the Turing test" are to AI research what a David Copperfield show in Vegas is to physics research. (And yes, his shows do involve some amount of physics and engineering.)
9 replies 17 retweets 90 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @fchollet
It's also important to say that the same year the test was invented ELIZA beat the test so passing the Turing test has NEVER been a big achievement
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
That happened ~15 years later.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.