The major flaw of the Turing test is that it entirely abdicates the responsibility of defining intelligence and how to evaluate it (the value of a test). Instead, it delegates the task to human judges, who themselves don't have a proper definition or a proper evaluation process.
-
-
Show this thread
-
As a result, the Turing test does not at all provide incentives to develop greater intelligence, it solely encourages developers to figure out how to trick humans into believing a chatbot is intelligent.
Show this thread -
If you were trying to assess that a matter teleportation occured by asking an audience of witnesses about it, you'd be encouraging the development of prestidigitation tricks, not research in physics. This is the same. The Turing test encourages deception, not progress.
Show this thread -
Bots that "pass the Turing test" are to AI research what a David Copperfield show in Vegas is to physics research. (And yes, his shows do involve some amount of physics and engineering.)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Time to change the goal as creating artificial human instead of calling it as artificial intelligence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People become temporiraly mad with AI everytime a particular calculus machine show new results. Now, it needs to work on new theories.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, what is Intelligence ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is exactly what a robot would tweet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.