I believe cultural wealth is more important than material wealth, i.e. it's better to have a house full of books than to have marble in your bathroom. Holds true for nations as well
Show this thread
-
While it is necessary to be financially comfortable to have a rich cultural life (in particular because you need free time), it's often much cheaper than funding the sort of lifestyle that society would normally associate with "being rich".
Show this thread
On a bigger scale, I'd argue that a nation that provides top-quality education and access to a rich cultural life to its citizens is providing a better standard of living than one that has a higher GDP per capita but that is largely a cultural wasteland
-
-
Of course, education and a rich cultural life (as well as free time to enjoy it) requires some level of material wealth. But my subjective impression both at the individual and national levels is that those with the highest living standards by my metrics are often not the richest
Show this thread -
Fundamentally, you can't buy goods & services as a replacement for meaning and wonder.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed. What is the public doesn’t want this — preferring trinkets and luxuries to higher learning and craftsmanship when given the chance? Is it the state’s responsibility to provide it anyway, or to support the development of a new culture?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.