Humans develop their full cognitive potential in an environment that is complex & challenging, without being overwhelming. Similarly, the big technological leaps of past civilizations have occurred in response to environmental constraints that were challenging, but not too harsh.
-
Show this thread
-
A lack of challenges and hardships is just as big an obstacle to the realization of one's potential as facing hardships so tough they cannot be overcome. This applies to individuals and cultures alike.
3 replies 8 retweets 74 likesShow this thread -
In the first few millennia of the history of civilization, natural environmental constraints were the main driver of (and limit to) human ingenuity. New technology arose from the need to survive in challenging environments.
1 reply 1 retweet 28 likesShow this thread -
Starting in the Antiquity, inter-cultural conflict & cooperation replaced nature as the main catalyser of progress. War, trade, competition started shaping the curriculum of civilization.
3 replies 1 retweet 26 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @fchollet
I agree with this sentiment, but what would you define as “too harsh” if not war?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
War *can* be too harsh, if it destroys you, which is certainly something that has happened repeatedly in the past and has caused civilizational regressions (e.g. Bronze Age collapse). But every war has a winner and a loser, and the loser may not necessarily end up crushed
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.