Humans develop their full cognitive potential in an environment that is complex & challenging, without being overwhelming. Similarly, the big technological leaps of past civilizations have occurred in response to environmental constraints that were challenging, but not too harsh.
-
-
I would go as far as saying that the particular environmental and historical circumstances of a civilization program the direction and speed of its progress in an almost deterministic way
Show this thread -
The need to rise up to the existential challenge of climate change will likely guide the next chapter of our progress over the next few centuries
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with this sentiment, but what would you define as “too harsh” if not war?
-
War *can* be too harsh, if it destroys you, which is certainly something that has happened repeatedly in the past and has caused civilizational regressions (e.g. Bronze Age collapse). But every war has a winner and a loser, and the loser may not necessarily end up crushed
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In-short evolution of life is like a video game, hard but not that unplayable hard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.