There was a Israeli study a few years ago that found that judges are 2 to 6 times more likely to grant parole after lunch than right before. This brings to mind the Oscar Wilde quote, "after a good dinner one can forgive anybody, even one's own relations" (a Thanksgiving classic)
-
-
I need to remember to bring a Snickers to trial...
-
Hungry for justice, why wait?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think I will speak with my team about moving our code reviews to the afternoon
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here is a finer analysis of the data which shows the conclusions may not hold.https://www.pnas.org/content/108/42/E833 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The idea that a single individual should have the power to judge other individuals is anti humanistic. The judge should only preside the court hearing. A remote panel of judges, who shall see/hear the case only through augmented race neutral real-time VR, should instead judge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
there are some critics, might be selection bias: judges pick easy cases first
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A similar study was mentioned in Daniel Kahnemann’s ‘Thinking fast and slow’
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.