This was the paper, for referencehttps://www.pnas.org/content/108/17/6889 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is scary. How many lives depend on someone’s satiated state.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe this was not correct as the order they heard cases was not random.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That fact was used in Thinking: fast and slow by Kahneman. Alas, I don’t remember what for

-
They wanted to point out that we’re not as rational as we think we are and that our thinking is often influenced by our biases and other factors such as hunger :/
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Anyone keen on trial by machine learning?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suppose there might be other factors that could affect the decision. Like if the dinner is cold or doesn’t taste that well, the likelihood of granting parole will likely diminish. I’m not even talking about our inherent biases that have an enormous impact on our thinking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There was an analysis that argued perhaps the conclusion of the surprising paper was wrong:https://mindhacks.com/2016/12/08/rational-judges-not-extraneous-factors-in-decisions/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.