This relies on a reasoning chain where every link is uncertain and any wrong link would invalidate the whole. Also relies on the Sherlock Holmes principle, "once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth", which is usually wronghttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1305522434465038337 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Makes for a good headline, though, and that's generally what matters most
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Science could use better PR. These kinda headlines just give wrong impression to lay people. A more appropriate headline may be “scientist found gas that may suggest microbial life”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would bet against it too since the odds seem pretty low. But, it would be one of those situations where I would be happy to be wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.