This relies on a reasoning chain where every link is uncertain and any wrong link would invalidate the whole. Also relies on the Sherlock Holmes principle, "once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth", which is usually wronghttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1305522434465038337 …
-
-
Based on meta observations about the study itself, with no knowledge of Venus or chemistry, I would bet against the conclusion that this is life
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This also sounds like a critique of old fashion “expert systems” AI with hard-coded rules that fail under many situations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.