Here's the thing about AI: you get what you optimize for. If you optimize for a specific skill, like chess or StarCraft, your final system will possess this skill and nothing else. It won't generalize to any other task. To generalize, you must optimize for generality itself.
-
-
You can't even enumerate the set of possible kitchens a robot might operate in. If you want to ever be able to deploy a L5 self-driven system or a human-level domestic robot, you have to figure out how to implement broad cognitive abilities -- beyond task-specific skills.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I promise you they have not. "Self-driving" is not a binary classification. That's what the L categories try to capture. Fchollet is talking about c3po level flexibility. Not deep nets that can recognize pedestrians and obey traffic laws.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Humans make mistakes too, they also have accidents when given a situation they haven't faced, self driving cars don't need to be perfect for all possible situations, they need to be better and more reliable than humans.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.