That model is assuming a sudden, dramatic drop in the next few weeks. No empirical data that I've seen supports this hypothesis. Every expert model I've seen since mid March has seemed completely irrational
-
-
Show this thread
-
At first, you could justify it by saying, "they didn't much data to work from, so the variance was high". This is no longer the case
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's unclear to me why the death rates will all of a sudden tank for the next month. Unless there's a deliberate cover up: https://www.tampabay.com/news/health/2020/04/29/florida-medical-examiners-were-releasing-coronavirus-death-data-the-state-made-them-stop/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IHME uses Farr's law which is 19th century bullshit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The 25k infections when we are in lockdown. As states lift lockdowns, the new infection rate will increase. Even with the best case scenario of 2k deaths/day, we will have 1.25 million deaths by Nov 3rd. This may be the worst disaster in US history.
-
No, the worst disaster in US history would be trump reelection, the second worst is his first election. You get to pick the third.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
On top of the fact that deaths out of hospitals are not counted and double the toll
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I sincerely can't believe you lead the AI research at google... Most of the deaths occur at the beginning, while the recovery takes longer
-
South Korea and Italy curves disageee
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.