Imagine -- your job is to have opinions on important issues (which then inform policy). You have an extensive track record of being wrong every time it mattered. And it doesn't harm your credibility one bit, because one month ago is so far back in the past
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
most consumers of punditry don’t want accuracy, they just want to hear their own opinions stated with great confidence
-
Seems right. Big problem. Is there anything we can do about it? I'm greatly concerned
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What does "introspection" look like?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the fact that Boris Johnson is in the ICU might help burst whatever remaining bubbles there are.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If only there were a longitudinal database to quantify such assessments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Because you (we) don’t know for sure what the CFR really is: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-mortality-risk …
End of conversation
-
-
-
I think the industry selectively removes those that are publicly introspective and admit fallibilities that aren't already widely known. The metrics they use to judge themselves (election wins, clicks) are basically independent of what the public needs them to do. Why bother?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pundits generally build their careers around making bad arguments about causality, and never admitting to it afterward. There’s a reason the crowd pushing miracle cures is the same one that pushes supply side economics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.