No they don’t. This is what people who don’t deeply understand statistics but want to sound smart say all the time. Correlation implies that you can consider causation, but doesn’t prove it. But people use that phrase as if correlation disproves causation. That’s plain stupidhttps://twitter.com/LeviABx/status/1244970629926998016 …
-
-
#ML models ok to use correlation when they’re making _predictions_. But the correlation vs causation paradoxes occur when we are trying to assess _intervening_. A can predict B if: A => B B => A or C => A and C => B But (change A) => (change B) iff A => B@yudapearlThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.