You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
People ask me, "if AGI is such a tainted term, what should people interested in generality call it?" It's a research direction, not a destination. A pragmatic answer is to call it "broad AI", or simply "artificial cognitive abilities" (in opposition to task-specific skills).
We're not going to get to generality overnight -- we're going to slowing climb there with AI of increasing flexibility, leveraging increasingly broad abilities. If you're moving in that direction, it should be enough -- and more realistic -- to say you're working on "broader AI".
Is not all/most all AI research interested in generality? I've yet to see a conclusions section of a paper say, "this only matters for the experiments listed above"
I'll cite this tweet in my next grant application when I'm applying for something that's not #DeepLearning. Here in Europe the funders are so obsessed with exploitation that sadly nobody gives cash for any new risky ideas. I really hope the funders realise how that stifles it.
Machine cognition?
They’re not perfect, but I like the phrases “more generally intelligent AI” or “task-agnostic AI”
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
