Generality in AI (which a matter of degree, not an absolute) is an v. important problem. Yet, strangely, the people who say they work on "AGI" don't seem to be interested in understanding the problem of generality, & instead focus on achieving task-specific skill by scaling up DL
-
-
I don’t understand. I thought if the EU just built up a common platform to pool all of the data then we could have AI?
-
Believe it or not, "surely a very large deep learning model trained on all the 'data' should have the answer to everything" is a position many people defend unironically
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A large enough system that works for everything will, for most of the development time, work on absolutely nothing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is a reflective part to intelligence that looks central to me. It is striking that the exhibited schema is a tree. The problem is that reflexivity is hard d to formally manipulate : you run into paradoxes and inconsistencies very fast.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How 'general' do you think human intelligence is? One could argue that we are just an amalgamate of narrow intelligences (and a very narrow selection from the set of possible 'intelligences' one should add)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is bizarre that a neural net that can score an 88% on imagenet, yet can't deal with point cloud 3d data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That sounds like a good characterization of the opinions of those not really involved in AGI but surely actual AGI workers know that there's a huge gap between current knowledge and the sci-fi AGIs, ignoring whether they really should be our goal anyway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Language already HAS causality in it. By using a meaning based linguistic framework combined with a brain-based theory, common sense reasoning are by-products. You can read more here about
@PatisNLU 's solutionhttps://medium.com/pat-inc/patom-theory-explains-language-acquisition-part-1-609b3c42ed18 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.