You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If the answer can be googled, or learned in one week on the job, then it's a bad interview question. You'll train your people, so hire for that which you can't train. No shibboleths.
I always ask the same questions (makes it easy to compare candidates), and they're very straightforward. No particular knowledge needed -- just the ability to program. No tricks.
We use it for all candidates. It's an excellent pulse check to see if the candidate has "just the ability to program" at a basic level but not terribly informative beyond that.
Can you share the template? I know there is no template per se, but can help us create our own! Thank you.
Any examples of such a broad question?
Leet code?
Yes. Some questions on leetcode doesn't require any tricks or specialized knowledge. Just the ability to program.
so Leetcode path which google initiated
"_just_ the ability yo program" ? What's that? As in, far from being clear cut or not easily misinterpreted...
I like what I say and for an interview very sensible. But what about the steps prior to this? With a sample of 100s or 1000s candidates, a signal is inferred from what is readily measurable. The same skewed filters you talk of seem to appear somewhere in the pipeline?
Exactly. Hire strong athletes you can train for the position you need. Over time you can retrain the same person to take on other positions. Another benefit of this approach is that your team will not dependent on one or two people. Virtually everyone can play anywhere.
How do you test trainibility? How do you test reliability and dependability?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
