I am irrationally excited about this. @fchollet has asked a set of fundamentally interesting questions with ARC and I'll be playing for fun! It's like Sudoku for AI addicts ;)
(n.b. I personally got many examples wrong - huzzah, a dataset where you question your own cognition 
)https://twitter.com/benhamner/status/1228070207400202240 …
-
What puzzles me though, is that you simultaneously claim credit for ARC and say that you profoundly disagree with every idea that ARC is built upon (in particular Core Knowledge). It's not coherent. It can't be both at the same time.
In any case, I really want to know that ARC is not in any way an attempt go slight you or steal from you. You are simply not a factor in the things I've said and thought over the last 10 years. Not everything is about you.
-
-
Thanks for the patronizing reply
@fchollet. Thanks to you, I am reminded that the world doesn't revolve around me. -
I wouldn't have to say it if you didn't post a barrage of tweets about your work in my mentions, for the Nth time since I published the ARC paper. It's not healthy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.