If an algorithm has "mastered natural language", I would expect it to be able to do some of the things language is for -- communicating information, receiving information, acting on the world... Not merely output something that statistically sounds like language.
-
-
I'm looking forward to seeing AI agents that: - Have a model of the world - Assume others do too - Use some form of language to update models on each side ... As well as many others things you use language for. It doesn't matter if their syntax is terrible.
Show this thread -
Much like an airplane, language has a function. No matter how realistic you make your image of a plane, if it misses the function, you still haven't mastered human flight.pic.twitter.com/UX8LDecrvS
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This time you hit the nail on its head. Will anyone on the AI bandwagon wake up? Statistic games are exciting, but irrelevant for our understanding of intelligence.
-
While I agree with
@fchollet's sentiments, I disagree with yours. "Playing" is an important part of science. At least according to a lot of great scientists, who talk about the importance of playing, having fun, rather than aiming for making great discoveries or grand theorising.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.