You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Yeah, and we started working on it in 2014. It doesn't matter whether you took anything from our paper or not -- it is prior work. You are *expected to read* prior work, take things from it, and then build on it.
As I explained, you don't cite papers based on topic similarity or tool overlap. If I write a "RL for games" paper once, it doesn't mean every subsequent "RL for games" paper must cite it (despite significant keyword overlap). You cite papers for one of three reasons:
1) it originated an important idea/method/tool that your work uses (attribution) 2) it offers a direct, competitive alternative to your proposal (which the reader should be made aware of) 3) it constitutes a reference survey that the reader can use to learn more about a topic
I have done my very best to trace the genealogy of every important idea in my own paper, and cite it. I have ~110 citations. In addition, my paper was reviewed by several experts before release, who suggested various references, which I almost all added. None suggested your paper
look, I don't need a general lesson on this. I can give you the specifics of why ours is prior work, and if you disagree, you don't need to cite. I am arguing on a principle here, not groveling for a citation.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
