Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
fchollet's profile
François Chollet
François Chollet
François Chollet
Verified account
@fchollet

Tweets

François CholletVerified account

@fchollet

Deep learning @google. Creator of Keras. Author of 'Deep Learning with Python'. Opinions are my own.

United States
fchollet.com
Joined August 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. François Chollet‏Verified account @fchollet 28 Dec 2019

      For any task in ARC, it's possible for a human to write a reasonably short computer program that can handle new pairs. Everything is straightforwardly computable -- unlike, say, classifying MNIST digits. There's no human advantage in any single task.https://github.com/fchollet/ARC 

      2 replies 30 retweets 180 likes
      Show this thread
    2. François Chollet‏Verified account @fchollet 28 Dec 2019

      Yet, there's currently no program that can solve a *new* ARC task. Such a program would be an incredible breakthrough in artificial intelligence. The ability to look at a new ARC task and come up with a solution program is, as of yet, uniquely human.

      3 replies 6 retweets 33 likes
      Show this thread
    3. François Chollet‏Verified account @fchollet 28 Dec 2019

      A task-specific solution program has no intelligence of its own. It's merely the output artifact of the process of intelligence. "Intelligence" is what happens in the mind of the 5-year-old kid who, looking at a *new* task, understands it and develops a solution protocol.

      3 replies 6 retweets 75 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Thomas G. Dietterich‏ @tdietterich 28 Dec 2019
      Replying to @fchollet

      Doesn't this argument apply to the 5-year-old also? It has no intelligence that wasn't placed there by evolution? Let's rather say that dealing with novelty is a central challenge for AI that is beyond current capabilities

      2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
      François Chollet‏Verified account @fchollet 28 Dec 2019
      Replying to @tdietterich

      No, it doesn't -- what makes the 5 year old intelligent is its ability to acquire new skills, solve new tasks. It's irrelevant who/what created the 5 year old, it's her generality that makes her intelligent. A task-specific program is not intelligent because it has no generality.

      11:01 AM - 28 Dec 2019
      • 5 Likes
      • Van Gomes Hamidreza Hosseinkhani Eduardo Pontes Reis vladdy Tom Ace
      3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Hector Palacios‏ @hectorpal 28 Dec 2019
          Replying to @fchollet @tdietterich

          Starting with few priors and adapt very well to narrow context is not trivial. Is that intelligence? It depends how it would survive in some other environments, like some life forms can strive in wide varieties of context. I don’t think it’s useful to draw a precise line.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Abel.TM‏ @Abel_TorresM 28 Dec 2019
          Replying to @hectorpal @fchollet @tdietterich

          Intelligence is an information processing mechanism for learning the regularities of the environment that uses the knowledge to attain goals. This applies to narrow or general scenarios depending on magnitude of priors, dynamics and capacities of the agent

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. jon‏ @JonofFive 28 Dec 2019
          Replying to @fchollet @tdietterich

          So in what context does that 5 year old, without personal prior experience, predictably fail? What is essential to few-shot learning

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Thomas G. Dietterich‏ @tdietterich 28 Dec 2019
          Replying to @fchollet

          As you know, I think 'intelligence' is a property of behavior rather than of agents. Successful behavior in the face of novelty is certainly intelligent, but so is, for example, rapid and correct speech recognition.

          5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
        3. Henning Schwabe‏ @SchwabeHenning 28 Dec 2019
          Replying to @tdietterich @fchollet

          That may be so, @tdietterich , yet „generality“ or „abstract reasoning“ as proposed by @fchollet still seems to be a useful criterion to define a future research program, is it not? Metaphors rarely convey the full argument so why not let them be?

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info