For any task in ARC, it's possible for a human to write a reasonably short computer program that can handle new pairs. Everything is straightforwardly computable -- unlike, say, classifying MNIST digits. There's no human advantage in any single task.https://github.com/fchollet/ARC
-
-
A task-specific solution program has no intelligence of its own. It's merely the output artifact of the process of intelligence. "Intelligence" is what happens in the mind of the 5-year-old kid who, looking at a *new* task, understands it and develops a solution protocol.
Show this thread -
The single biggest misconception in AI is the confusion b/t unintelligent output artifacts (skill programs) & the process that generates them. "Artificial intelligence" has been focusing purely on task-specific automation, entirely disregarding intelligence. Time to change that.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Want to try it with ima
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Il me semble que https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Problems_of_Philosophy … contient des analyses de la notion de connaissance qui sont pertinentes pour la définition de l'intelligence. (connaissance empirique immédiate, connaissance par description, connaissance des "vérités")
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.