The only good answer here: the brain is an incredibly complex thing, encompassing many parts that are structured differently, and we know extremely little about it. We cannot definitely answer the question.
-
-
Show this thread
-
However, my gut feeling is that the brain is generally not DL, although some submodules could be described as DL or part-DL (e.g. the visual cortex is a deep hierarchy of features, albeit not all are learned, and has been a considerable source of inspiration in DL).
Show this thread -
I would add that our current understanding and usage of modern deep learning -- its genealogy -- lies mostly in earlier modern machine learning techniques, not in neuroscience. The influence of neuroscience has been one of high-level conceptual inspiration, not direct emulation.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
I don’t think brain is doing a back prop which is driver of deep learning . Also a child learns from sparse data . One aspect is what a network has learnt. Is it really features or statistical regularities which also bengio talks of in context of cnn
-
May be the answer lies in evolving network architecture on evolutionary algorithms rather then a back propagation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"conceptual inspiration, not direct emulation" - @ToluClassics the hype.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kindly, there's a bit of false equivalency comparison here between "deep learning" & expression, output, of learned value(s). Mechanisms of input & output in the brain may overlap but they're also not uniform in execution - probably.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

