It's entertainment. It is to AI research what a David Copperfield show in Vegas is to experimental physics. It's fun, but don't portray it as science.
Show this thread
There is no qualitative difference between "interviewing" a language model by using it to generate lots of answers then selecting those you like, & the TV "interviews" of Sophia the Robot. In both cases we're looking at a puppet, and projecting human intentions & emotions on it.
-
-
-
If you're a research lab, you probably don't want to be known for prestidigitation tricks being passed of as breakthroughs in media written for the scientifically illiterate. Honestly, it's just sad, I can't even understand the logic behind it
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From Dennett: The intentional stance is permissive. A system has a belief in case its behavior can be predicted by treating it as a believer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about if you had a learned model select from GPT-2 responses ??? GPT-2 skepticism is getting out of control
-
I don't think this is skepticism, he is talking about what the model is and what is not. If you look at some of those answers, you can understand that it is just reflecting what people have written online about AI, but it misleads layman into thinking it is some cognitive model.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Spot on analysis and analogy. As always. Thanks for helping me sort my brain while providing arguments for discussions with the layman. Appreciate it.
#FrancoisKnowsHisShitThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
... but you always win when you keeping rolling the die until you get the number you want.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.