Imagine an algorithm capable of generating a Wikipedia-like encyclopedia from raw sources (e.g. from the Internet minus Wikipedia), at the same level of factual accuracy, edition quality, scope, and resolution. When will this be feasible?
-
-
the people that voted less than 5 yrs or less than 15%... man, that's some optimism!! Even the "within 50 yrs" is somewhat optimistic
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So within 15 years is actually within 25 years?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's just like autonomous driving. We get so close yet never surpass.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably it will generate uncyclopedia.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It also reflects, in my opinion, people's idea of the value of Wikipedia. Wikipedia has much more nuance than a mere aggregator of information... the endless editor debates and wars give a glimpse of this. What you ask requires close to general AI, which I don't think is possible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Many good responses. What do you
@fchollet see as the top 5 challenges to this task as of 2019?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“always wrong” individually, sure, but the ensemble?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
> People's perceptions are always wrong this perception is yours
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My intuition is that the main challenge, the filtering of quality, will need to be based rather on metadata than on NLP-based detection.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.