"The war between ML frameworks has raged on since the rebirth of deep learning." That's a bit too dramatic though, no?https://twitter.com/gradientpub/status/1182327049307844613 …
-
-
Not 588,000, mind you. 588. That's what the data says.
-
These left and right jabs.


pic.twitter.com/dfVJsgp1Xi
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't be jealous, take me as intern and i will tell everyone how wonderful tf realy is =D
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you explain why you think its cherrypicked? I "cherry picked" the conference list, but I believe it should roughly match consensus. If you have other conferences you think I should add to the figures I'd be glad to do so.
-
FYI the actual split in the research world is ~30-40% PT vs ~60-70% TF/Keras. This is the range of numbers you get by looking at 1) ArXiv mentions data, 2) Colab usage, 3) Actual research surveys. All the sources I can think of end up in this range. Extremely dishonest article.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The fact that TF2 is copying PyTorch feature by feature is a pretty clear indicator which one of these the community likes more
I bet it'd be pretty hard to find 588 people that actually *enjoy* TF1 
-
Seems you live in some parallel universe so cannot find 588 people. Pytorch copies all its features, one by one, from chainer! If you don't know.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hi
@acganesh , could you confirm then that you agreed to time publishing the opinion piece with the PyTorch conference?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thats it, this calls for a cage match between Chollet and Chintala.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.