The specialization of human intelligence, perhaps paradoxically, is also the source of its generalization power.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @fchollet
Slightly off topic, there's good reason to be suspicious of "generalists" who are not also "specialists" in something. I don't think one can generalize usefully unless one already has access to a generalizable "structure" in which new knowledge can be rooted; sorted, interpreted.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @_onionesque @fchollet
*off topic, in the same vein. I tend to think that deeper the specialization (as long as the object of specialization could afford a powerful enough meta-language), stronger the generalizability to areas outside the specialization.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_onionesque
It's a matter of abstraction and abstractibility. Specialization without abstraction is single-use.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @fchollet @_onionesque
In autism one thing that can happen is person may know perfectly well how to behave in one situation but not be able to generalize it to a similar slightly different situation. Those skills needs to be explicitly taught, over and over. Generalization can (sometimes) then occur.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Sounds interesting. Do you have a reference for that?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.