I've been reading a lot of old AI papers lately -- ranging from 1950 to 2010. It's interesting how contemporary a lot of these still feel to this day. The fundamental questions are still the same, and we still don't have any solid answers.
-
-
There's nothing new under the sun,just rediscovery and repackaging. Sometimes a seed idea waiting for germination with right time
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The models of neurons we use in AI haven't changed over that timeframe. But we understand biological neurons a lot better now. I've written a short book about how real neurons work, and drafted some new algorithms based on that understanding. It's free on http://www.corticalcircuitry.com/
-
Thanks for sharing! Will read your ideas
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Watch the Lighthill / McCarthy debate in 1973 or so. Amazing how little has changed...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe AI researchers need first to understand human-intelligence and then implement it. I could be wrong but it seems to me that's not what they've been doing. I fear they decided long ago that the above is not possible and thereafter have been doing something quite different.
-
Everyone who is serious about human-level AI is also interested in understanding human intelligence. And there is in fact a lot of inspiration that can be drawn from psychology and neuroscience (perhaps more from psychology than neuroscience).
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The truth of the matter is that progress has been made not because we know anything more, but because we have more hardware to throw at it. But, I do think we're acutely aware of this and I feel it gives us a sense of foreboding that we aren't breaking the wall.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love that papers <10 years old are now old, insofar as to be lumped in with AI of the 50s :p
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like this though. There’s still a lot to learn. It’s early days. Lots of low-hanging fruit. No “standard model” (not that that is final but it is pretty darn solid theory)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
May be we need a new math to tackle this challenge
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.