Please make the papers you write available for free on the internet. No one should have to pay $50 to a predatory publisher to read a paper. You won't even see any royalties on that.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah, I’m not sure he understands how this works. I’ve never had a journal ask for less than $2000 for open access fee. Faculty without very large grants don’t have that kind of money. Access is a problem; but, it’s not the authors’ fault.
End of conversation
-
-
-
How to replace the impact factor?
-
Exactly! If I publish my paper in a leading journal of my field, it’s a mark of distinction, the journal accepted my paper and published it. If I just post it online or on
@arxiv - anyone can do it. The latter is option for scientists that are already tenured and have a name - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And release your code too... A paper that is not purely theoretical and that can't be reproduced technically is just marketing, not science...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess its now hard to change the whole acidemic system which relies directly on the strength of these payed journals , but any ways THANKS
#SCIHUB !!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There still needs to be a structure in place for vetting. Self hosted material is generally regarded as less credible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A ground breaking idea as a viral tweet would have way more influence than the same idea buried behind a $50 paper
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.