Descartes on the limits of Artificial Intelligence: "Even though such machines might do some things as well as we do them, or perhaps even better, they would inevitably fail in others, which would reveal they were acting not through understanding" (Discourse on the Method, 1637)
-
-
This shows greater clarity of thought than a number of 20th century AI researchers
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm hesitant to comment since I'm entirely a layperson here, but human cognition does seem to be composed of a large number of subroutines with very specific focuses. Sorry. Much respek.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Descartes would have opinioned differently had he been in today's times. :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
humans not immune from this. every system has limits. do you suppose that intelligence is irreducible? that we won’t be able to form “committees of networks” that get at all sides of a concept? that will have methods of extrapolation? intelligence is that grand? we will.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What offers the question if we can attribute the term intelligence to artificial at all? Artificial logic perhaps describing the now better than betting on an artificial future;
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would have to disagree. He is saying that the machines of his time do not do what they do because they understand what they do. That's all he's saying, don't extrapolate anything beyond that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.