Having formal decision systems (i.e. AI), that are transparent, possibly interpreted by humans, frequently patched, may be the future of governance. We've been using a rather immature version of this very system for judicial decisions. Extending it to economic policy isn't crazy.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Replacing personal human power with formal rules that are known to all and for which there is an update mechanism meant to represent the will of the people is the essence of the rule of law. And the rule of law is the better government system so far. AI is just an extension.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bring it on. Just let it be human readable and correctable for the edge cases and grey areas.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your first take was correct. Laws and institutions aren't "code" by any stretch, and still grant a significant amount of leeway to the people applying/occupying them - as they sometimes should.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So basically we would have elections choosing between different algorithms? :-)
-
The politicians are all bombastic, narcissistic, hypocritical, sadistic, pathological liars!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
No countries are ‘ruled by’ laws & institutions, except in an empty sense that includes those that regulate & distribute decision-making power to humans, & neither are really v similar to computer code.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Common Law = roughly evolutionary code. Top down static is one shot trick shot and never works.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.