Clearly the Bay Area startup scene is where you go when you're a pure product of privilege yet you still want to fancy yourself as self-made and anti-establishment
-
-
On one hand, the tech scene discourse is purely group-think, the supermajority of founders unconditionally embrace mainstream culture & ideology, and self-identify with stereotypes On the other hand, SF/SV rhetoric is all about thought leadership, daring to be think differently
Show this thread -
On one hand, the supermajority of founders are representatives of existing power structures and embrace the system and the goodies it provides them On the other hand, SF/SV rhetoric is all about disruption, being rebels, changing the world It's a jarring contrast.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agree, but you can probably replace "founders" by "Tech people"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this really true empirically for the large companies? Larry/Sergey weren’t rich I think. Jack wasn’t born rich and no Ivy League. Zuck might meet this ( dad was a dentist). Travis K meets neither.
-
Yeah, this is literally like the 4 biggest startups out of the bay. What about the 100 others that have raised between $5-15M and are Stanford/Berkeley grads who embrace 'cold water' baths after listening to a podcast? I think that's the point he's trying to make.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure "rags-to-riches" is the right mythology. Feels like the "riches" part is more important to this crowd than the "rags" part.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.