Let's clarify this... On one hand, the supermajority of SF/SV founders were born rich, went to an Ivy (nearly a requirement to get funded), are part of the network. On the other hand, SF/SV rhetoric is all about rag-to-riches stories, lionizing founders as self-made heroes
-
-
Show this thread
-
On one hand, the tech scene discourse is purely group-think, the supermajority of founders unconditionally embrace mainstream culture & ideology, and self-identify with stereotypes On the other hand, SF/SV rhetoric is all about thought leadership, daring to be think differently
Show this thread -
On one hand, the supermajority of founders are representatives of existing power structures and embrace the system and the goodies it provides them On the other hand, SF/SV rhetoric is all about disruption, being rebels, changing the world It's a jarring contrast.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it makes for better Medium thought pieces
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I do want to go there. Does it mean that I am a pure product of privilege?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anti-establishment and aspiring haut-bourgeoisie don't go together.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hahahah trop vrai! J'ai passé un an la bas et tout le monde sortait les plus grosses conneries saupoudrées de "to make the world a better place"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He's alluding more to the in-person connections at universities like Harvard and Stanford.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.