AI that plays games is my least favorite kind of AI. I'd much rather have AI that makes games for me to play
Show this thread
Dead serious about this -- the development of AI in the future will be tied to games, but not primarily because we'll be designing AIs to play human games.
-
-
So true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's the point in creating AI that play games. In the end we'll make AI that enjoys products made by AI. What's the point in all that?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If we build the right neural structure we can maybe part train it in a virtual environment. But a real environment would be best. Imagine how messed up a kid could be if we raised them with VR goggles in some crappy simulation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually. It's quite possible to partially train an AGI by manually imparting data directly into its structure. Training not even needed?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah AI might beat us but we still invented Chess and Go.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The extent to which an AI will be like an opponent playing a human game, is the extent to which a Dungeon Master is the 'opponent' of the players (not at all).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes! for real world problems and simulations also. After all, ideally games in their best form would be simulations(physical accuracy too) of real world phenomena, and for a bonus it always helps to cater the imagination with some fantasy!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.