"Critique of pure reason" isn't just a book by Immanuel Kant, it's also a 1987 essay on AI by Drew McDermott.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00183.x …
-
-
So, you mean that the path to enlightment in A.I. passses through an epistemological disruption. Makes sense even more if we consider the complexity of open systems, as Bertallanfy stated in 1950.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am not against the concept of ‘thinking’ as discerning between multiple causal paths. What is wrong with that?
-
We make conclusions based on 2 levels of intelligence. The first is derived from weightings. X has more weight therefore is more prominent in my mental search. The second is based on attaching labels like x = "correct" so I will pick that regardless of any weight.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
representing meaning for machines has not been done by DL or any state of the art methodology.
@PatisNLU does it and will provide the step change required for conversationalAI, replacing the limitations of SOTAThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Logic is a tool to analyze human reasoning and to see whether it is consistent. In particular, you cannot use arguments to back a claim if those arguments are inconsistent. However a system first needs to be able to make some meaningful claims in order to be analyzed logically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.