In the first place, cognition evolved as an engine for behavior generation. It's only in this context that we can understand it
Show this thread
Wittgenstein: "our talk gets its meaning from the rest of our proceedings" We cannot study intelligence, thinking, or language in isolation. They are contextual, specialized -- to think is to refine a practical activity, a method
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
Yes yes yes!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So the Turing test is baloney? So is the wizard of oz!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is deep.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if there exists a single mechanism that gives rise to all aspects of our intelligence, including thinking, language, learning, identifying problems, solving problems, enacting solutions to problems, self awareness, and consciousness? Because it seems to me that there is.
-
Given that there is, we only need study enough aspects of intelligence to grasp this mechanism.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What would an AI program (engineering focused but not limited) that took this idea seriously look like? What tools would it use? Conceptual frameworks? Which disciplines would it collaborate with or borrow from?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Linguists study specific phenomena in isolation all the time, just like one does in any science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.