I thought about that in the context of politicians some time ago. Telling the truth doesn't pay off. People don't get excited if you make realistic promises. People want you to solve all their problems, and when people believe that, it ends up creating some messianic figures.
-
-
-
And the fun thing is that these kind of Messiahs are not really good, almost by definition. They are either dishonest or simply misguided in a Dunning-Kruger effect kind of way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Humans update priors in a quasi-rational Bayesian way - if we see confidence, we automatically assume that the actor will deliver on promises/knows what he's doing and assign higher mean belief to his potential.
-
Well said, but please rephrase as gender neutral.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
AI and politics are like a pool, everyone wants to swim into these, irrespective of their knowledge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Realism and pragmatism don't make stories which you can sell, but sensationalist lies do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Both are heavily subject to Alberto Brandolini's quote: "The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"There is nothing that can stop terrible ideas and memes from spreading"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Im sure
@RichardDawkins could provide us some light on that. This is an old story!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
