I don't really like the term "AGI", and I prefer to use "strong AI" to denote artificial intelligence at human level or above. First of all, because intelligence is never general in any real sense. Human intelligence itself is highly specialized. Specialization is a requirement.
-
-
This tweet, however, seems correct to me. The psy theory is immune against this argument as IQ is defined relative to other people - so a high iq person should be better at octopusing than a low one. But I get the different perspective of agi to be concerned with _every_ task..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.. which seems unlikely and ultimately should not even be the goal as you stated in your very first tweet. Thanks for the exchange!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.