Second, because "AGI" makes it sounds like intelligence is a binary: either it's general or it's not. In fact, intelligence is more like a spectrum, from intelligence with weaker generalization capabilities, to intelligence with stronger generalization capabilities.
-
-
Show this thread
-
It would be illusory to believe that all we have to do to "solve intelligence" is to reach a specific threshold of "general intelligence", and that our work would then be done. You can't "invent AGI". But you always create intelligence with stronger generalization power.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
How much different is this http://theconversation.com/does-playing-chess-make-you-smarter-a-look-at-the-evidence-76062 … than the critiques of Alpha Go and DeepBlue as not being AGI or even AI?
End of conversation
-
-
-
How can we quantify the difference of strong AI from ordinary AI? Should there be a standardized test to measure the IQ of AI? Should we call it AIQ
?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
While that sounds convincing, it's contrary to psychological scientific consensus. Evidence strongly suggests a g factor: people who are good at one cognitive task are very likely to be good at another.
-
I came here to say this. g theory is one of the most dependable findings in psychology
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Who used the term general artificial intelligence first? Was it John McCarthy?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
General is meant to signify the adaptive nature of the intelligence (as opposed to narrow). A calculator for example is a narrow intelligence. A calculator would be strong intelligence wrt to long division.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.