The problem with futurism is often an inability to distinguish between things that are engineering problems (e.g. a permanent base on Mars), things that are likely theoretically possible but for which there is no known path and certainly no timeline (e.g. a 1000-yr lifespan), ...
-
-
Why self-improving AI is cognitive fallacy?
-
I was about to ask the same question, why?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I fully agree with your point in general, but why do you consider exponentially self-improving superhuman AI as a cognitive fallacy? I don't agree with AI alarmist like
@elonmusk or@BillGates that this is any kind of immediate threat, but I would consider it possible in theory -
Similar sentiments by this HN commentator https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407801 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In my book, fully autonomous cars fall into that last category. People are wildly underestimating how difficult it is.
-
Which present company would you place at the forefront of self-driving technology?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Another usual mistake: overlooking markets and economic margins. We could have flying drones carrying people around, it's technologically feasible, but other things are more profitable, e.g. Facebook, Uber,…
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
aren't we the exponentially self-improving human Intelligence?
-
Not exponentially, sadly
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But that's exaclty what sci-fi is made of
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.