Here is the same dynamic RNN implemented in 4 different frameworks (TensorFlow/Keras, MXNet/Gluon, Chainer, PyTorch). Can you tell which is which?pic.twitter.com/nsfuTULlKS
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Tthose frameworks differs only in time of execution (with @TensorFlow being a little faster than keras, for example)
I have seen some implementation differences in some algorithms, which could conceivably lead to different accuracies. It can be due to implementation errors, underspecified algorithms, or different default parameter values.
At least it had better not!
Tell that the people who tried research this topics before the CUDA frameworks became available. Be sure to dress with protective clothing before doing so.
Of course framework and language matters when considered in general time and memory consumption _are_ part of any algorithm's properties and its result. We just don't care usually, and you might not see as you compare apples with apples.
I don’t think is a nonsense. Frameworks have different ways to address mem and compute execution. Accuracy as some level is guarantee but it will differ as well... I have been working on acceleration of nn and accuracy always changes when switching to different frameworks
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.