Many people believe that machine learning algorithms are analytical -- that they ponder over the data available and do logical, unbiased reasoning using some internal model. They're the opposite of that: they're intuitive. They do pattern recognition. They're System 1, not 2.
-
-
I would substitute correlations with associations to include non-linear relationships
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well and forensically put.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have found that the image from the paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04938 of a husky misidentified as a wolf because of snow in the image to be helpful in explaining what you are describing.pic.twitter.com/sMHVyJt1cO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s not the statistical definition of bias.
-
But appreciate the same word is used for a different purpose in ML circles.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One source of confusion might be that sometimes people use "bias" to refer to the properties of a model that *prevent* it from paying too much attention to spurious correlations. E.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias%E2%80%93variance_tradeoff …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would not that bias, personally, but "over-sensitivity to spurious correlation". When the data is gathered as you should in any pure scientific experiment (with proper control), you can mitigate this to a large extent. Right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.