When it comes to important decisions about other people, avoid having to rely on one person's gut feeling. Even if it's a very "intuitive" person
Show this thread
It's always a major red flag when a decision-maker claims to have "great intuition for judging people" or "a x-ray for character". Human intuition is fundamentally biased -- much like machine learning algorithms, but often worse.
-
-
-
Usually, "I have a social radar" means "I make categorical, discriminatory judgments about strangers after 30s of interaction, based on subjective personal preferences, including whether I like your face, and I am extremely confident about it"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Often worse...really? Agree with the above statement except the last part of "often worse".
-
There have been countless studies about it. Human intuition is consistently worse than data-driven decisions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Confirmation bias!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An augmentation of human intuition and data driven approach shd work out fine
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you have studied body language, vocal analysis & have experience dealing with a full spectrum of people, I wouldn’t put it past them to make the right call the first time. Intuition is mostly from past experiences, and if you don’t have extensive exp. then you’ll likely fail
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Machine learning algorithms are not biased. They become biased with the data they are training for. Please be careful with this kind of statments, misleads people with no expertise in ML
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.